Subject: Re: Latest CERT advisory on telnet vs. Kerberos
To: Mike Long <mike.long@analog.com>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@kuma.web.net>
List: current-users
Date: 02/22/1995 14:20:59
[ On Wed, February 22, 1995 at 11:17:11 (EST), Mike Long wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Latest CERT advisory on telnet vs. Kerberos
>
> Now that we (U.S. users) have /usr/src/domestic, is it possible that
> an unmangled version of telnet et. al. will show up there?
I just don't get it.... Why is it called "domestic"?
Also, why strip out the enabling hooks in an application? There's no
actual encryption technology encoded in there....
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 443-1734 VE3TCP robohack!woods
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; UniForum Canada <woods@uniforum.ca>