Subject: Re: new vfork(2) implementation
To: Todd Vierling <tv@pobox.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
List: current-users
Date: 01/04/1998 10:53:25
On Sun, 4 Jan 1998 10:24:47 -0500 (EST) 
 Todd Vierling <tv@pobox.com> wrote:

 > Is there any reason sh could be "fixed" to use vfork()?  Considering the
 > enormous number of scripts out there that use sh, this could be a big
 > performance gain. 

This would be an interesting project, I think, yes.

Jason R. Thorpe                                       thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center                            Home: +1 408 866 1912
NAS: M/S 258-6                                       Work: +1 650 604 0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035                             Pager: +1 415 428 6939