On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, Martin Husemann wrote:

> > If we need a good (and portable) tool, we should consider creating one
> > that matches other goals of NetBSD.
> 
> I aggree. Some of the people advocating CVSup should come forward with a
> design document, a protocol description and we could see if we find a
> volunteer to do an acceptable implemention - that might even be
> interoperable ;-)
> 
Would it be a waste of time just to rewrite it because of modula-3 ?

If it does run only on limited NetBSD platforms just because lack of
compiler , then why not use it at least on those platforms.?

I run sup over a modem and it is really slow , if CVSup uses the bandwidth
more efficiently why not offer the service , it's only additional means of
getting software transferred.


btw. is it possible to install the client directly from freebsd or has
someone already made a NetBSD package ?


Tom
-- 
=============================+===========================
Tom Javen                    |   Innotrac Diagnostics Oy
email tom.javen@innotrac.fi  |   Finland
gsm   +358-40-5860532        |   phone +358-2-2410025
                             |   fax   +358-2-2410024
=============================+===========================