On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 08:37:22PM -0300, Jared D. McNeill wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > 2-6 are at the bottom of the band; 95-99 and 14-22 are between 6 and 7
> > (in that order); 7-13 are next and 23-158 go up from there.
> 
> This is consistent with what I'm experiencing -- channels 2 is the worst
> of all, 3 through 6 are about equally bad, 7 through 13 are a bit better
> but still not perfect, and 14 and up is where it starts to get better.

5 is also a special case in Canada. It overlaps with CBC's on-air
frequency, and they have strong transmitters nationwide. That's why
almost all cable companies in Canada put the 'TV Guide' channel on 5,
because they would get complaints about ghost images from the strong
on-air signal leaking into the cable (if they put a tv channel with
video on 5).

-- 
David Maxwell, david@vex.net|david@maxwell.net -->
All this stuff in twice the space would only look half as bad!
					      - me