On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Richard Rauch wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 08:25:30PM +1100, Giles Lean wrote:
> > 
> > > If one doesn't have a machine to spare for -current, what's the
> > > best way to work on a relatively static program?  Unpack 1.6 sources
> > > and work on that?  Link against the *installed* 1.6 libraries?
> > 
> > Yes -- just compile your program on 1.6.  You will quite likely
> 
> Well, I asked because when I tried that initially (in a freshly set
> up -current source tree), "make" or "make window" in the appropriate
> directory failed.  It seemed to want all of the context for making
> everything, so I stepped up to the top level and did "./bulid.sh build".

setenv USETOOLS no

	Johnny

Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus
                                  ||  on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt@update.uu.se           ||  Reading murder books
pdp is alive!                     ||  tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol