On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 09:02:25PM +0000, Patrick Welche wrote:
> Something changed.. I never saw 100% charge before..

To be more precise:

NetBSD 1.6ZE (HP) #71: Sat Nov  1 20:52:48 GMT 2003
% envstat -r 
    acpiacad0 connected
       acpibat0 present
    acpibat0 design cap:      4.000 Ah
 acpibat0 last full cap:      2.764 Ah
    acpibat0 technology:          1
acpibat0 design voltage:     14.800 V
      acpibat0 warn cap:      0.320 Ah (11.58%)
       acpibat0 low cap:      0.200 Ah ( 7.24%)
       acpibat0 voltage:     16.635 V
   acpibat0 charge rate:      0.000 A
acpibat0 discharge rate:      0.000 A
        acpibat0 charge:      2.764 Ah (100.00%)
    acpitz0 temperature:     54.050 degC
 
NetBSD 1.6ZE (HP) #69: Sun Oct 26 15:55:21 GMT 2003
% envstat -r
    acpiacad0 connected
       acpibat0 present
    acpibat0 design cap:     59.200 Wh
       acpibat0 lfc cap:     40.907 Wh (69.10%)
    acpibat0 technology:          1
acpibat0 design voltage:     14.800 V
      acpibat0 warn cap:      4.736 Wh
       acpibat0 low cap:      2.960 Wh
       acpibat0 voltage:     16.643 V
         acpibat0 power:     -0.001 W
        acpibat0 energy:     40.907 Wh (69.10%)
    acpitz0 temperature:     51.050 degC


So before it was "energy" not "charge" (sounds good - normally you wait
for the battery to finish charging);
"acpibat0 last full cap"/"acpibat0 design cap"*100 was printed in brackets
after "acpibat0 last full cap" (which could come back - you know when to
throw your battery away);
and Ah instead of Wh seems like an improvemnt.

Cheers,

Patrick