Subject: Re: NOTE: ACPI update
To: Charles M. Hannum <abuse@spamalicious.com>
From: Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>
List: current-users
Date: 11/02/2003 17:40:01
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 05:11:11PM +0000, Charles M. Hannum wrote:
> On Sunday 02 November 2003 04:13 pm, Patrick Welche wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 09:02:25PM +0000, Patrick Welche wrote:
> > > Something changed.. I never saw 100% charge before..
> >
> > To be more precise:
> >
> > NetBSD 1.6ZE (HP) #71: Sat Nov 1 20:52:48 GMT 2003
> > % envstat -r
> > acpiacad0 connected
> > acpibat0 present
> > acpibat0 design cap: 4.000 Ah
> > acpibat0 last full cap: 2.764 Ah
> > acpibat0 technology: 1
> > acpibat0 design voltage: 14.800 V
> > acpibat0 warn cap: 0.320 Ah (11.58%)
> > acpibat0 low cap: 0.200 Ah ( 7.24%)
> > acpibat0 voltage: 16.635 V
> > acpibat0 charge rate: 0.000 A
> > acpibat0 discharge rate: 0.000 A
> > acpibat0 charge: 2.764 Ah (100.00%)
> > acpitz0 temperature: 54.050 degC
> >
> > NetBSD 1.6ZE (HP) #69: Sun Oct 26 15:55:21 GMT 2003
> > % envstat -r
> > acpiacad0 connected
> > acpibat0 present
> > acpibat0 design cap: 59.200 Wh
> > acpibat0 lfc cap: 40.907 Wh (69.10%)
> > acpibat0 technology: 1
> > acpibat0 design voltage: 14.800 V
> > acpibat0 warn cap: 4.736 Wh
> > acpibat0 low cap: 2.960 Wh
> > acpibat0 voltage: 16.643 V
> > acpibat0 power: -0.001 W
> > acpibat0 energy: 40.907 Wh (69.10%)
> > acpitz0 temperature: 51.050 degC
>
> Wow, I would *not* have expected it to change from Wh to Ah. I suspected you
> might be using a different machine or battery, but the numbers work out the
> same. Very wacky.
>
> What model machine is this? I'd like to look at the DSDT and see WTF it's
> doing.
It's an hp pavilion zt1141s. I didn't know the units came out as part of the
acpi query!
Cheers,
Patrick