Nathan J. Williams wrote:
> Well, it's duplicating what ugen does. The man page for uscanner(4)
> says that it's for compatibility with a Linux driver, but the Linux
> folks punted it ages ago (and it's been suggested that we follow
> along). So I would suggest not putting more resources into anything
> but ensuring that we can punt it as well. One such resource would be
> using your scanner with ugen(4) instead uscanner(4) and confirming
> that it works.

   Cool.  Fair enough.  If the hope/plan is to punt that driver,
than I agree nothing else should be added to it to continue
it's use...

                 - Chris