Subject: Re: altq api for ipf and pf
To: None <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Miles Nordin <carton@Ivy.NET>
List: current-users
Date: 09/25/2005 20:13:19
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sun_Sep_25_20:13:07_2005-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>>>>> "tes" == Thomas E Spanjaard <tgen@netphreax.net> writes:
tes> The lack of a sophisticated API,
well...ok, but please do see my earlier post for a completely
different opinion.
tes> I as well am very interested in a sound, sophisticated
tes> solution worthy of inclusion in NetBSD. But since ALTQ already
tes> got imported as is,
Are you saying the {Open,Free}BSD PF/ALTQ is imported to -current now?
I didn't hear anything about this on tech-net nor on the NetBSD-pf
list, so I thought -current still included the old ALTQ that's missing
some important features OpenBSD added, and more importantly doesn't
use mbuf tags so it won't work with a cooperating external packet
filter like ipf or pf.
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sun_Sep_25_20:13:07_2005-1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)
iQCVAwUAQzc9H4nCBbTaW/4dAQLqRAP+MH3B6j586hE+W6zM1SPTC8YsF2l3omPX
y3gyoyoCdtdNEmCS7KNZNtdCke2gJqbCNChXctu7YbDpVPmAkxss2GJwFiJc0b1T
x6CGgjj+UUM69gJeB0uebNzmd8DCjZQjpEQcAVKHeSSu5qFEJ+44vageEvsU55XD
dYTGMxf+kPM=
=8In9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Sun_Sep_25_20:13:07_2005-1--