Subject: Re: ural device timeout on -current
To: None <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Martijn van Buul <pino@dohd.org>
List: current-users
Date: 10/27/2005 14:40:43
It occurred to me that Kouichirou Hiratsuka wrote in gmane.os.netbsd.current:
>> Anyway, it cannot associate, scanning trough wiconfig does not show any 
>> AP even if it's present.
>
> Can wiconfig(8) use for ral(4)?  I've never used it.

It can, and wiconfig ral0 -D used to work - it broke recently.

-- 
    Martijn van Buul - pino@dohd.org - http://www.stack.nl/~martijnb/
	 Geek code: G--  - Visit OuterSpace: mud.stack.nl 3333
 The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
discoveries, is not 'Eureka!' (I found it!) but 'That's funny ...' Isaac Asimov