On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 09:34:29AM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 11:31:55PM +0100, Pavel Cahyna wrote:
> 
> > How can d_off be invalid? It was returned by the kernel before, so it
> > should be valid, no?
> 
> Which takes us right back to tmpfs directory cookies.

So is it a bug in tmpfs or glibc? If I understand it correctly, the
problem is in tmpfs. (Does it return directory cookies that it does not
accept as offsets for lseek() ?)

Pavel Cahyna