Re: build.sh vs. LD_RUN_PATH

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%rek.tjls.com@localhost>]

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:20:00AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
>
> I've had some fun finding out why build.sh failed in src/lib/libz when  
> crossbuilding from Linux. The failure was because the tools lint picked 
> up the NetBSD libz.so in the obj dir instead of the system libz.so. This 
> in turn was because I had set LD_RUN_PATH to something that included "." 
> when the tools lint was linked. Which leads me to the question:

Honestly, putting "." into LD_RUN_PATH strikes me as deserve-to-lose
behavior that we shouldn't change anything to "support".  Do you run with
"." in root's path, too?

Thor