On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 07:21:30AM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2008, at 6:19 AM, Bernd Ernesti wrote: > >> [Including matt who changed it to 5.99.01] >> >> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 02:22:32PM +0100, Adam Hoka wrote: >>> Zafer Aydo?an wrote: >>> >>>> hello list, >>>> >>>> in the past kernel bumps were notated like 4.99.1 .. 4.99.9 >>>> now I'm seeing 5.99.01, 5.99.02. >>>> >>>> Which one is correct ? >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, Zafer. >>> >>> I'm also interested. >>> file(1) still says 5.99.1. >>> >>> Was this change intentional? >> >> Matt, what was the reason to go to 5.99.01 instead of 5.99.1? > > The comment isn't really used so it's actually 5.99.1. it'll back > to two digits soon enough. :) I bet stuff will break at 08. Let's make .3 fo the next one. -- Quentin Garnier - cube%cubidou.net@localhost - cube%NetBSD.org@localhost "See the look on my face from staying too long in one place [...] every time the morning breaks I know I'm closer to falling" KT Tunstall, Saving My Face, Drastic Fantastic, 2007.
Attachment:
pgphblcHxtCcw.pgp
Description: PGP signature