Re: Lightweight virtualization - the rump approach

[Antti Kantee <pooka%cs.hut.fi@localhost>]

On Fri May 14 2010 at 18:29:41 +0300, Antti Kantee wrote:
> On Thu May 13 2010 at 18:51:16 +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> > I am not posting this to reinstate the decades old monolithic vs 
> > microkernel troll, so please avoid that field; thanks.
> 
> I hope people on these lists are adult enough to realize that argument
> is pointless.  The correct answer to which is better is of course "both"
> (or "neither", as code I hope get committed later today or during the
> weekend will quite measurably demonstrate).

In case someone doesn't follow source-changes, but is curious of what
I meant, here's the relevant bit:

http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2010/05/18/msg010052.html