Re: SRP unencumbered license statement

To: RJ Atkinson <rja%inet.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: SRP unencumbered license statement
From: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman%columbia.edu@localhost>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 9:34:34 EDT

> bi-directional authentication mode (SRP-Z) requires a  
> separate licence, and is not free.  Only implicit server
> authentication mode is free.
> 
>         Your statement above appears at variance with the actual
> words from Stanford.  I'd encourage folks to go read the actual
> words from Stanford, not anyone's interpretations of them.

Implicit server authentication mode is the mode detailed by RFC 2945.
It is all that is necessary for our applications.

Prev by Date: Re: SRP unencumbered license statement
Next by Date: Re: SRP unencumbered license statement
Previous by Thread: another trademark application
Next by Thread: setting environment variables
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index