At 21:14 28/11/01, Darren Moffat wrote:
>I'm certainly not trying to cloud the issue
>and I don't think others are either.
Darren,
Kindly put the shoe on the other foot for a moment.
What problem is solved by omitting the DES-CBC information
from the drafts ? Are we saving bytes on a disk or what ?
Ran
rja%inet.org@localhost