Re: [PATCH] Using TCP_NODELAY unconditionally

To: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams%ubsw.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Using TCP_NODELAY unconditionally
From: Markus Friedl <markus%openbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 10:26:15 +0100

On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:24:28AM +0100, Markus Friedl wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:41:37AM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> > Since the protocol allows a variety of kinds of traffic to be exchanged
> > over a TCP connection, some which should be used with Nagle, and some
> > which shouldn't, the protocol should really be capable of implementing
> > Nagle on a per-channel basis and always run with TCP_NODELAY, but that's
> > a lot easier said than done.
> 
> ietf-ssh is the place for this.

ietf-ssh%netbsd.org@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Using TCP_NODELAY unconditionally
  - From: Nicolas Williams

Prev by Date: ssh, x.509v3 certificates, and PKCS-7 ?
Next by Date: ssh-agent protocol
Previous by Thread: ssh, x.509v3 certificates, and PKCS-7 ?
Next by Thread: Re: [PATCH] Using TCP_NODELAY unconditionally
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index