Re: consensus probe.

[Damien Miller <djm%mindrot.org@localhost>]

On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Darren Moffat wrote:

> >Okay, I see significant volume of comments saying that we need to
> >re-spin the core drafts once again to address the following two issues:
> >
> > - Split the ambiguous x.509 text into a new document.  (this seems
> >   non-controversial at the moment)
> 
> In doing this the quickest and eaisest way is to remove ALL references
> to X.509 from the core drafts - is this what people want me to do ?

Yes - we can thrash out the details in a seperate document.

-d