IETF-SSH archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: public key (was Re: consensus probe.)
[ wg chair hat off ]
> > Public key / certificate formats that do not
> > explicitly specify a signature format identifier
> > MUST be considered to use the public key / certificate
> > format identifier as the signature identifier.
>
> However, doesn't this sound like it can be interpreted as if the signature
> format identifier might be ommited alltogether?! (or is it just me beeing
> dizzy here?).
I'd delete "be considered to", resulting in:
> Public key / certificate formats that do not explicitly specify a
> signature format identifier MUST use the public key / certificate
> format identifier as the signature identifier.
- Bill
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index