IETF-SSH archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: public key (was Re: consensus probe.)



[ wg chair hat off ]

> >   Public key / certificate formats that do not
> >   explicitly specify a signature format identifier
> >   MUST be considered to use the public key / certificate
> >   format identifier as the signature identifier.
> 
> However, doesn't this sound like it can be interpreted as if the signature
> format identifier might be ommited alltogether?! (or is it just me beeing
> dizzy here?).

I'd delete "be considered to", resulting in:

>   Public key / certificate formats that do not explicitly specify a
>   signature format identifier MUST use the public key / certificate
>   format identifier as the signature identifier.

					- Bill



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index