Re: additional core draft nits in need of WG attention.

To: Niels Möller <nisse%lysator.liu.se@localhost>
Subject: Re: additional core draft nits in need of WG attention.
From: Markus Friedl <markus%openbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:13:06 +0100

On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:40:53AM +0100, Niels Möller wrote:
> The details must be spelled out. If we really want to get rid of this
> possibility, the cleanest and least confusing way of doing it would be
> to define protocol version 2.1 with a changed KEXINIT format,

i don't think it makes sense to switch to a new protocol version
because of this minor issue.  it makes only sense if you don't have
to care about interoperability.

References:
- Re: additional core draft nits in need of WG attention.
  - From: Peter Gutmann
- Re: additional core draft nits in need of WG attention.
  - From: Niels Möller

Prev by Date: Re: Comments on DH-GEX draft
Next by Date: Re: additional core draft nits in need of WG attention.
Previous by Thread: Re: additional core draft nits in need of WG attention.
Next by Thread: Re: additional core draft nits in need of WG attention.
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index