RE: query about draft-ietf-secsh-connect-19.txt

["denis bider" <ietf-ssh%denisbider.com@localhost>]

> It appears that some changes need to be made to [connect].
...
> 2) Make a decision that [connect] must either
>   a) mandate that replies to channel requests MUST be in order, or
>   b) change the protocol to have the responses identify the channel.
> I'm betting that this group will opt for (a).  If so, could 
> someone please propose some text.


Beg pardon?

Responses do identify the channel.


>      byte      SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_SUCCESS
>      uint32    recipient_channel
> --
>      byte      SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_FAILURE
>      uint32    recipient_channel


[CONNECT] should mandate that replies to channel requests need not be in order
overall, but must be in order for each channel. Replies to global requests must
be in order overall.