Re: Silliness: Some symbolic values undefined

[Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld%sun.com@localhost>]

On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 07:52, Ben Harris wrote:
> It looks like the following message types don't have their numeric values 
> specified anywhere in the current drafts, which is unfortunate:
> 
> SSH_MSG_KEXDH_INIT      30
> SSH_MSG_KEXDH_REPLY     31
> 
> I'd suggest that they be put back into the "Summary of Message Numbers" in 
> [SSH-TRANS].

Whoops.  Yes.  Good catch.

						- Bill