Re: WG Chair Nits & start of WG Last Call: draft-ietf-secsh-publickeyfile-06.txt

[Joseph Galbraith <galb-list%vandyke.com@localhost>]

> This Last Call assumes that the following nits will be corrected in a
> new revision submitted in the near future:

I just submitted it.

> Proposed edits:
>
>  1) replace references to RFC2044 with references to RFC3629.

Done.
>  2) insert a new subsection of section 3 titled "Differences with
> RFC1421 PEM formats" containing the following text or equivalent:
>
> Implemetors should take care to notice that while the format is
> superficially similar to that specified by PEM [RFC1421] and PGP
> [RFC1991], it is not identical; most notably:
>  1) The other specifications use different BEGIN/END delimeters (five
> dashes, no space rather than four dashes and a space).
>  2) there is no blank line before the start of the base64-encoded
> contents.

Done.

Thanks,

Joseph