Richard Whalen wrote:
Yes, VMS fits the rational for this extension. I think that this and the copy files extension are
> interesting extensions, but I'm also of the feeling > that they should be put in an informational draft > because the more that keeps getting added to the > main SFTP draft, the longer it will be before we have > sufficient consensus for it to move forward as an RFC. All right... that sounds fine to me. That also means we can defer fleshing out the proposals until someone is ready to implement them. Thanks, Joseph