Re: Your DISCUSS on draft-ietf-secsh-newmodes-05

[Ben Harris <bjh21%bjh21.me.uk@localhost>]

In article <1126296848.17794.221.camel@thunk> you write:
>       At this time it appears likely that a future
>       specification will promote aes128-ctr to be REQUIRED;
>       implementation of this algorithm is very strongly encouraged.

I like this.  It makes the future direction clear without committing us to a
particular route, and it doesn't introduce awkward concepts like
"implementing newmodes".

-- 
Ben Harris