Re: Additional AD Comment: draft-ietf-secsh-publickey-subsystem and garbage

[Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams%Sun.COM@localhost>]

On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 05:35:09PM -0400, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> I think this argument is pointless.  Since the obvious solution has been 
> proposed (twice, I think), and no one seems to object, what does it matter 
> how strong the requirement is?

It's practically pointless :)

I think no change is required but don't object to the proposed change.
I'll shut up now.

Nico
--