Re: draft-bjh21-ssh-transport-extension-01

[Ben Harris <bjh21%bjh21.me.uk@localhost>]

On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Joseph Galbraith wrote:

> 3. Do we need a nod to in-order vs. out-of-order processing:

I don't think so, for the same reason that I dropped the security 
consideration about packets sent before SSH_MSG_NEWKEYS: the issue applies 
to all extensions that define new message types, whether they do it by 
assigning a whole message number or by using a named message.  It would be 
perverse to impose a more stringent requirement on named messages than on 
numbered ones.

On your other points, Simon's and der Mouse's replies cover everything I 
was going to say.

-- 
Ben Harris