IETF-SSH archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Extension of the agent protocol for the PKCS#11 URI scheme



> I think it's a (past) mistake to think of the agent protocol as being
> something private, rather than something for which interoperability
> is desirable and therefore for which standardization is appropriate.
> I imagine if someone wanted to write an I-D documenting the protocol
> and setting up a registry for these values, that would be a good
> thing.  Not that I'm volunteering, mind you.

At least one such I-D has existed; the IETF apparently thew away their
copies(!), but
http://www.vandyke.com/technology/draft-ietf-secsh-agent.txt has what
looks like the latest version I know of.  It's somewhat broken -
perhaps most notably, it has an eight-bit field for which one of the
specified values is 301 - but it's about the best I know of.  It, or
perhaps some other version of that draft, is what I wrote my agent
implementation to.

I am not willing to jump through the IETF's stupid I-D hoops (and, yes,
I believe that's what they are), so I will not be resurrecting it as an
I-D.  I would cheerfully collaborate on the content if someone else
wants to undertake the hoop-jumping.  If not, I'll volunteer to host a
non-IETF document; under those circumstances, that's about as close to
a standard as we're likely to get.

/~\ The ASCII				  Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML		mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index