Regularising ssh-ed25519

[Ben Harris <bjh21%bjh21.me.uk@localhost>]

I've written an Internet-Draft describing how to use Ed25519 in SSH and 
formally allocating the name "ssh-ed25519" for it:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bjh21-ssh-ed25519/

The primary purpose of this is to regularise the use of that name by 
implementations.  I'd like to know what other SSH implementors think of 
this draft.  Questions I'm particularly interested in include:

* Is the specification technically correct?

* Is my guess that the first implementation of ssh-ed25519 was in OpenSSH 
by Markus Friedl correct?

* Is there a better way to reference the OpenSSH 6.5 release notes?

* Should this be Informational or Standards Track?  An IETF-approved 
Informational RFC is the minimum that's required to get an algorithm name 
allocated, but if ssh-ed25519 is expected to be the new standard 
public-key format, maybe it's worth the effort to put this on the 
Standards Track.

Replies to <ietf-ssh%NetBSD.org@localhost>, please.

--
Ben Harris