[pkgsrc/trunk]: pkgsrc/net/samba Remove stray )

[jlam <jlam%pkgsrc.org@localhost>]

details:   https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/pkgsrc/rev/693a7f325600
branches:  trunk
changeset: 461169:693a7f325600
user:      jlam <jlam%pkgsrc.org@localhost>
date:      Fri Sep 12 06:04:14 2003 +0000

description:
Remove stray )

diffstat:

 net/samba/MESSAGE.smbpasswd |  4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diffs (19 lines):

diff -r a8439822750a -r 693a7f325600 net/samba/MESSAGE.smbpasswd
--- a/net/samba/MESSAGE.smbpasswd       Fri Sep 12 05:15:03 2003 +0000
+++ b/net/samba/MESSAGE.smbpasswd       Fri Sep 12 06:04:14 2003 +0000
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ===========================================================================
-$NetBSD: MESSAGE.smbpasswd,v 1.3 2002/08/25 21:50:10 jlam Exp $
+$NetBSD: MESSAGE.smbpasswd,v 1.4 2003/09/12 06:04:14 jlam Exp $
 
                       *===* SECURITY NOTES *===*
 
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 
        ${SAMBA_PRIVATE}/smbpasswd
 
-with owner ${ROOT_USER}, group ${ROOT_GROUP}), and file mode 0600.
+with owner ${ROOT_USER}, group ${ROOT_GROUP}, and file mode 0600.
 These encrypted passwords are _PASSWORD_EQUIVALENT_ from the viewpoint of
 the SMB protocol.  Do _NOT_ weaken the permissions of this file unless
 there is a very good reason.