Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/x11

["Aleksey Cheusov" <vle%gmx.net@localhost>]

> Why not put buildlink with openssl in qt4-libs/buildlink3.mk?
> (BUILDLINK_ABI_DEPENDS.qt4-libs had been bumped though)
> Then, need to recursive bump?

Before commit, I tested a few kde applications. They were built successfully 
and worked fine. So, I didn't see a reason
for putting openssl to qt4-libs/buildlink3.mk. Those who need it
can ".include" appropriate bl3 explicitely.

Recursive revision bump. Packages that do not need openssl support in qt4 were 
built successfully. Those who need it -- failed on systems having no openssl in 
base.
I _presume_ old packages should work fine with new qt4-libs.
It is unlikely that adding support for openssl breaks
ABI. What's the reason for recursive bump?
Testing qt4/kde packages under NetBSD for build failures?

-- 
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de