pkgsrc-Changes archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/lang/mercury
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:04:10AM +0400, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
> David Holland <dholland-pkgchanges%netbsd.org@localhost> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 05:40:02AM +0000, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
> > > Modified Files:
> > > pkgsrc/lang/mercury: Makefile PLIST distinfo
> > > pkgsrc/lang/mercury/patches: patch-ab patch-ap patch-at
> > > Removed Files:
> > > pkgsrc/lang/mercury/patches: patch-ar patch-as
> > >
> > > Log Message:
> > > Update to Mercury 11.07
> >
> > /home/pkgbulk/c/obj/lang/mercury/work/mercury-compiler-11.07/boehm_gc/../scripts/mgnuc
> > --grade asm_fast.gc --no-ansi --no-check --no-mercury-stdlib-dir
> > -I./include -I./libatomic_ops-install/include -DNO_EXECUTE_PERMISSION
> > -DLARGE_CONFIG -fpic -DMR_PIC -DNO_DEBUGGING
> > -I/home/pkgbulk/b/pkg/include -I/usr/include -c -o os_dep.o os_dep.c
> > os_dep.c:503:9: error: redefinition of 'GC_data_start'
> > os_dep.c:454:9: note: previous definition of 'GC_data_start' was here
> > gmake[3]: *** [os_dep.o] Error 1
> >
> > Note that this is an improvement on the prior build behavior, which
> > was SIGSEGV. :-/
>
> No, it isn't. It just doesn't reach the stage where it broke previously.
Oh. Blah.
...anyhow, would it be better to make it use pkgsrc boehm-gc? (And is
it using boehm-gc and threads?)
--
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index