Hi John!
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:45:23PM +0000, John Marino wrote:
Module Name: pkgsrc
Committed By: marino
Date: Tue Jul 17 17:45:23 UTC 2012
Modified Files:
pkgsrc/net/ocamlnet: distinfo
Added Files:
pkgsrc/net/ocamlnet/patches: patch-src_netsys_netsys__c.c
Log Message:
net/ocamlnet: Fix for systems without AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW
DragonFly doesn't define AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW. The added patch will
appropriately disable linkat support.
No revbump necessary - this patch doesn't change the binary on systems
for which it has already built.
Thanks for the patch. Can you please include these helpful comments in
the patches themselves as well? It helps packagers coming after you to
find out why a patch was added without having to read cvs annotate/cvs
log output; and in general you should assume that there are more
reading patches than writing them.
To make it clearer that comments in patches are a requirement, I've
changed pkglint to make missing patches an error now.
I'd also like to ask you to send the patches upstream. Sending them
upstream is more effort, I know (I've been there, and still am), but
it also builds visibility for DragonFly and helps people after you who
update packages. So I'd appreciate it if you could do that as well. It
will take time away from fixing all packages to build on DragonFly,
but I think the numbers are good enough already that making the rest
build does not have to be the highest priority any longer.
Just to be clear, this mail is not about this packge in particular,
but on patches in pkgsrc in general, and you're not the only
recipient, but you triggered the general reminder.
Thanks,
Thomas