--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> > Ok, now that got me confused. :) (And just when I thought I am done
> > with my questions hehe!). I really did think that the 2006-Q1 branch
> > is older than -current. My impression was that its a stable freeze of
> > -current, made sometime in March 2006, and after that all it has is
> > just security updates. So that way -current has nearly 2 months worth
> > of newer software than 2006-Q1. Turns out I was wrong? (By "stable
> > freeze" above, I meant that all the software in that are stable and
> > work well with each other etc).

> > I remember someone pointing out that 2006Q1 is a different branch (I
> > think he used the word "revision") ... but I didn't pay much attention
> > coz I thought he meant it was a different "older" branch ...

How did you receive the mail you've replied to? The part above was
non-existent in the mail I received. There was only quoted text. That
was at least the second time this happened on this list.

--=20
Christian

--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (NetBSD)

iD4DBQFEexgw0KQix3oyIMcRAtbTAJj86aUS12cQUF1nDaSAEQzBoqluAJ0a/nto
U3JZxHQ/xr8kGanrxYQwMA==
=skOm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e--