On Sat, 19 May 2007 13:09:11 +0300
Hasso Tepper <hasso@estpak.ee> wrote:

> Raymond Meyer wrote:
> > Well I Googled and turns out others hade similar problems with isinf on
> > Solaris. Something to do with GCC optimising calls to isinf during
> > configure tests, so that it returns 0 and it appears as if isinf is
> > implemented. I'll look at it in more details when I've got time.
> 
> Does attached patch fixes the problem for you?
> 
> If you are building from release tarball, just search for isnan(f) and
> isinf() from configure script and insert return before them.

I'll test your patch but it'll be a while, since I'm reinstalling Solaris on a
different machine.