On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:48:46 +0200
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de> wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 09:39:18AM -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> > On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 15:28:18 +0200
> > Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > Like I said, I think it violates POLA as well to include something
> > > that is not part of modular Xorg. We had a similiar situation with
> > > xorg-clients, as that always shipped way to ancient version of
> > > xterm. I don't mind that much whether or not it is included, but
> > > it feels not right to call it a modular Xorg component.
> > > 
> > OK -- but what about a MESSAGE warning people?
> 
> I don't mind that :-)
> 
It's a deal; thanks....  (And thanks for your help last night on the NV
driver.)


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb