Re: missing symlink in openoffice2-bin?

[Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost>]

"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost> writes:

> I *think* there's a missing symlink in the openoffice2-bin package.
> The symlinks in pkg/bin don't resolve.  I think what's necessary is
>
>       cd /usr/pkg
>       ln -s emul/linux/openoffice.org2.2
>
> Could someone check this?  My setup is a bit odd.

I am seeing this to, and that fixes things for me.  But, I'm not at all
sure what's correct.  Is there a grand plan for where Linux programs
live on NetBSD/i386?  Sure, libraries unpacked from suse are in
/emul/linux, but for example acroread7 installs under /usr/pkg but not
emul.  Perhaps the bug is that most of oo is in emul/linux?