Re: graphics/gle won't build -- can't find glut

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost>]

On Sat, 3 May 2008 17:44:02 +0200
"Daniel Horecki" <shinden%linux.pl@localhost> wrote:

> On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Steven M. Bellovin
> <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost> wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 May 2008 16:25:23 +0200
> >
> > "Daniel Horecki" <shinden%linux.pl@localhost> wrote:
> >
> >  > On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Steven M. Bellovin
> >  > <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost> wrote:
> >  > > On Sat, 3 May 2008 15:43:17 +0200
> >  > >
> >  > > "Daniel Horecki" <shinden%linux.pl@localhost> wrote:
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > > >  Don't know if it's that case, but try to add pthreads
> >  > > > > things to gle
> >  > >  > >  Makefile. In ${WRKSRC}/config.log should be mention of
> >  > >  > > this.
> >  > >  > >
> >  > >  > >  Daniel
> >  > >  > >
> >  > >  > >  --
> >  > >  > >  Daniel Horecki
> >  > >  > >  http://morr.pl
> >  > >  > >
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  > Yes, that's pthreads problem. Mesa is linked with pthreads,
> >  > >  > while gle doesn't use that. With attached diff I can build
> >  > >  > successful.
> >  > >  >
> >  > >  It didn't work for me.  I've put the config log at
> >  > >  http://www.machshav.com/~smb/gle-config.log
> >  > >
> >  > >  Do I need to rebuild something else first, like glut, perhaps
> >  > > with similar changes?
> >  > >
> >  >
> >  > Could be. There is PR on this:
> >  > http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=38503
> >
> >  That PR describes exactly what I'm seeing.
> >
> > >
> >  > But lately I have setup DRI on my lap and I have defined
> >  > PKG_OPTIONS.MesaLib+=dri...
> >  > And I'm using wip/Mesa*, but that doesn't seems to be problem,
> >  > because that version was imported from wip to pkgsrc.
> >  > TODO file in graphics/MesaLib mention patch. Can you try apply
> >  > that?
> >  >
> >  Of course, rebuilding MesaLib means rebuilding more or less the
> > entire world, it seems, and these don't feel like the kind of
> > changes I should risk doing a 'make replace' on...
> >
> >  Any guesses as to which is a better approach, that patch or the dri
> >  option?
> >
> 
> Either way you should recompile MesaLib. I guess that because dri
> works for me and one more person, it could be better.
> And you can recompile only MesaLib, with patch you have to recompile
> libX11, which is even more work.
> And dri option should work without drm option in kernel.
> 
The patch didn't apply cleanly, so I've gone with dri, and I'm now
rebuilding everything...

Thanks -- when all is done, I'll post a summary.


                --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb