Re: Update wm/pekwm to 0.1.9a

[Guillaume Lasmayous <netbsd-lists%guigui2.net@localhost>]

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:48:30 +0100, Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost> 
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 03:49:23PM +0100, Guillaume Lasmayous wrote:
>> I just updated wm/pekwm to the latest release, 0.1.9a.
>> Compiled and tested OK on x86/current.
>>
>> Can someone verify the patch and commit it into pkgsrc, if it's OK. I'm
> not
>> completely sure how this kind of versionning should be handled..
> 
> We're in a freeze right -- please use send-pr(1) to make sure your
> contribution isn't lost.

Done. PR/40260

> 
>> @@ -37,7 +37,5 @@
>>  .include "../../x11/libSM/buildlink3.mk"
>>  .include "../../x11/libXext/buildlink3.mk"
>>  .include "../../x11/libXinerama/buildlink3.mk"
>> -.include "../../x11/libXft/buildlink3.mk"
>>  .include "../../x11/libXpm/buildlink3.mk"
>> -.include "../../x11/libXrandr/buildlink3.mk"
>>  .include "../../mk/bsd.pkg.mk"
> 
> Why are you removing these two?
>  Thomas

I did my tests using NetBSD-current running X.org native, with
pkgsrc-current.
verifypc told me libXft and libXrandr were not direct dependencies, so I
thought they could be removed. In my particular case, it works. But this
may not be wise to remove them in fact, to be able to handle NetBSD-4.0
with modular xorg from pkgsrc for instance.
PR is submitted without removing those two.

Wish you all a Merry Christmas!

Guillaume.