Salut,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:47:41PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> This is the only one that jumped out at me as maybe mattering. 2.3 is
> ancient, and anything not keeping up is obviously unmaintained. I
> suppose anyone running apache 1.3 is really behind in updating, so I
> don't object, just thinking out loud.
There are many valid reasons to run Apache 1.3 even these days, one
of them being licensing.
Tonnerre
Attachment:
pgpO6g7kqL6pv.pgp
Description: PGP signature