(maybe related to PR 42395) On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:00:25 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 05:02:37PM +0200, Cem Kayali / E Ticaret ve Bilisim Teknolojileri wrote:Is there a specific reason to exclude *mt-d* libraries from devel/boost-libs?They are the default.
Yes, then PLIST of devel/boost-libs was completely changed when updated to 1.40. Probably, need to recursive bump to rebuild packages depending on boost-libs. -- "Of course I love NetBSD":-) OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost