Re: [HEADS UP] Package removal -- please check

[Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:45:11PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
>     Date:        Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:52:04 +0100
>     From:        Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>
>     Message-ID:  <20110218095204.GJ13800%danbala.tuwien.ac.at@localhost>
> 
>   | x11/xteddy2
> 
> Is that gtk1?  I thought xteddy was gtk1 and xteddy2 was gtk2?
> (another imlib inheritance I guess, but if all the indirect ones are
> getting found, what happened to xdaemon2?)

imlib, correct, and I used finddepends to find the dependencies, which
doesn't match DEPENDS like xdaemon2 uses.

> That one has been known to be used ... both as itself, and as a
> requirement of xdaemon2 (which is how one views the beastie ...)

So I gather we keep xdaemon2 and xteddy2 for now. Can't go without
beasties!

Someone interested in porting xdaemon2 to imlib2?
 Thomas