Re: Forthcoming Ruby packages framework update

[Takahiro Kambe <taca%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

Hi,

In message <20111107195353.GA6654%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
        on Mon, 7 Nov 2011 20:53:53 +0100,
        Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 10:33:04PM +0900, Takahiro Kambe wrote:
>> In message <20111107142652.GA3914%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
>>      on Mon, 7 Nov 2011 15:26:52 +0100,
>>      Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 07:04:51PM +0900, Takahiro Kambe wrote:
>> >> * RUBY_VERSION_DEFAULT would be changed:
>> >> 
>> >>   from:   1.8 or 1.9
>> >>   to:     18, 192 or 193.
>> > 
>> > Is it really necessary?
>> Which part do you mean?
> 
> Distinguishing packages between 1.9.2 and 1.9.3.
In short, there are two point:

1. I hope it is enough compatibility between 1.9.2 and 1.9.3,
   but I'm not sure at this point.  So providing safer migration path.

2. Future Ruby might not keep API compatibility even if teeny version.

-- 
Takahiro Kambe <taca%NetBSD.org@localhost>/<taca%back-street.net@localhost>