Re: Binary packages (again)

[Aleksey Cheusov <cheusov%tut.by@localhost>]

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Aleksej Saushev <asau%inbox.ru@localhost> 
wrote:
> Cursory investigation reveals that we don't have
> packages for NetBSD 5.1 (neither for i386 nor for amd64) or have only
> obsolete packages,

I build amd64/5.1 packages and they are available on ftp server.

> and other related problems.

What exactly?

> Can we solve these issues somehow?
>
> I understand that we might be tight on disk space and other resources,
> but then lets' make our preferences more reasonable then! That is prefer
> hosting 5.1.2 packages instead of 5.0.2 ones, if we have to choose
> between the two. Or lets' drop building packages for 4.0 branch.
> Having no binary packages for recent releases doesn't help using NetBSD at 
> all!

Users of 5.1/i386 may use binary packages built
for 5.0/i386 + 5.0_branchindep/All/compat50-5.1.tgz