On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 09:51:56PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:40:50 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger
<joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 01:24:02PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
>>I see...
>>
>>using *.xz archive, so marked as build depend on archive/xz,
>>but check-shlib claims using shlibs from build depends.
>>It's false alarm.
>
>I can reproduce it now. It is *not* a false alarm. libxml2 should be
>pulling in a full xz dependency, since libxml2.so depends on it now, but
>it only gets counted as build dependency.
No, not only directly build dependency, but also indirectly full dependency.
In other words, directly build dependency on `xzcat' command from archive/xz,
and indirect full dependency on `liblzma' from archive/xz.
Right, there is no such thing as an indirect full dependency...