Rhialto <rhialto%falu.nl@localhost> writes:
> On Thu 12 Jul 2012 at 00:51:41 +0900, Makoto Fujiwara wrote:
>> --- graphics/graphviz/Makefile 14 Jun 2012 07:44:36 -0000 1.100
>> +++ graphics/graphviz/Makefile 11 Jul 2012 15:44:01 -0000
>> @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@
>> REPLACE_PERL+= config/config_perl.pl lib/gd/configure.pl \
>> tclpkg/gv/demo/modgraph.pl contrib/dotmcl.pl \
>> contrib/dirgraph/dirgraph.pl
>> -
>> +.include "../../wip/tcl85/Makefile.version"
>> +PLIST_SUBST+= TCL_VERSION=${TCL_VERSION:C/.[0-9]*$//}
>
> That would make a regular package depend on a wip package. For people
> who use wip, I suppose that could be ok, but not everybody has wip.
> Maybe there is a better solution.
pkgsrc may not depend on wip. However, if there's a package in wip we
need, then we should evaluate the wip package for bringing into pkgsrc
proper.
So:
Does tcl85 build multiple places, pass pkglint, etc?
Should it replace tcl, or be alongside? Are the CONFLICTS in place?
Which version is 'normal' and 'new', or is it 'crufty' and 'normal'?\
Attachment:
pgp7vzjDA_g2U.pgp
Description: PGP signature