Re: vim-xaw users out there?

["Martin S. Weber" <Ephaeton%gmx.net@localhost>]

On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 04:45:13PM +0100, Matthias Kretschmer wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 09:07:26AM -0500, Martin S. Weber wrote:
> > Hmm. Maybe. I'm using fvwm 2.5.31nb2 here. I'll have to investigate some 
> > more.
> 
> I'm running something different (ctwm) here.  But I totally
> forgot that I have
> 
> .if !empty(.CURDIR:M*/editors/vim*)
> CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --with-features=big
> .endif
> 
> It would be a nice test, if that changes something for you.

It doesn't. I put the above in my /etc/mk.conf and checked the configure output 
--
it's definitely adding the 'big' feature. But no change in behaviour..

f y amusement, the configure diffs of xaw vs. gtk2 ..

@@ -1371,13 +1371,9 @@
 checking for XpmCreatePixmapFromData in -lXpm... yes
 checking if X11 header files implicitly declare return values... no
 checking size of wchar_t is 2 bytes... no
-checking --enable-gui argument... Athena GUI support
-checking if Athena header files can be found... yes
-checking for XShapeQueryExtension in -lXext... yes
-checking for wslen in -lw... no
-checking for dlsym in -ldl... no
-checking for XmuCreateStippledPixmap in -lXmu... yes
-checking for extra X11 defines... no
+checking --enable-gui argument... GTK+ 2.x GUI support
+checking --disable-gtktest argument... gtk test enabled
+checking for GTK - version >= 2.2.0... yes; found version 2.24.12
 checking X11/SM/SMlib.h usability... yes
 checking X11/SM/SMlib.h presence... yes
 checking for X11/SM/SMlib.h... yes
@@ -1389,7 +1385,6 @@
 checking for X11/Sunkeysym.h... yes
 checking for XIMText in X11/Xlib.h... yes
 X GUI selected; xim has been enabled
-checking for X11/Xmu/Editres.h... yes
 checking whether toupper is broken... no
 checking whether __DATE__ and __TIME__ work... yes
 checking whether __attribute__((unused)) is allowed... yes

-Martin