Re: package name for x11/xf86-video-ati6

[Robert Swindells <rjs%fdy2.co.uk@localhost>]

Thomas Klausner wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:41:57AM +0200, Nicolas Thauvin wrote:
>> I recently updated my packages and found that I'm impacted with PR
>> 47935. So I installed x11/xf86-video-ati6, but it created a
>> xf86-video-ati-6.14.6.
>> 
>> The package name may conflict with x11/xf86-video-ati, since this one
>> has a newer version, it would overwrite the other if both are built in
>> a pbulk. Am I correct?
>
>Both are built by a bulk build. Depending on what tools you use for
>installing your packages, the version from xf86-video-ati might get
>installed since it has a higher version number.

Why not mark xf86-video-ati as NOT_FOR_PLATFORM=NetBSD-* ?

Or even ONLY_FOR_PLATFORM=Linux.

Robert Swindells