On Feb 25, 2014, at 13:35 , manu%netbsd.org@localhost (Emmanuel Dreyfus) wrote: > Fredrik Pettai <pettai%nordu.net@localhost> wrote: > >> Could you update it so it applies smoothly to HEAD? > > Here it is: > http://ftp.espci.fr/shadow/manu/sendmail2.patch That patch seems to have other problems: ... => Verifying /home/pettai/pkgsrc/mail/sendmail/../../mail/sendmail/patches/patch-getpwnam ************************************** Ignoring patch file /home/pettai/pkgsrc/mail/sendmail/../../mail/sendmail/patches/patch-getpwnam: no checksum found ************************************** => Ignoring patchfile /home/pettai/pkgsrc/mail/sendmail/../../mail/sendmail/patches/patch-getpwnam.orig => Verifying /home/pettai/pkgsrc/mail/sendmail/../../mail/sendmail/patches/patch-sendmail_tls.c => Applying pkgsrc patch /home/pettai/pkgsrc/mail/sendmail/../../mail/sendmail/patches/patch-sendmail_tls.c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |$NetBSD$ | |ECDH support, from upstream | |Index: tls.c |--- sendmail/tls.c 13 Sep 2013 21:06:50 -0000 8.123 |+++ sendmail/tls.c 15 Nov 2013 16:23:59 -0000 8.124 -------------------------- Patching file sendmail/tls.c using Plan A... Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail