pkgsrc-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: ffmpeg3 "x11" option vs "vaapi", "vdpau" options
Greg Troxel writes:
> It strikes me that the notion of having options "enabled but masked" is
> a basically wrong thing to do. If those options (that I don't
> understand) depend on x11 being enabled to be sensible, it seems that
> the build of ffmpeg3 should be fail hard with either and not x11.
>
> There is probably also an underlying test for the vaapi/vdpau options
> that if present assumes that x11 was enabled. That could probably be
> tracked down and fixed, but it seems best to avoid the inconsistency in
> the first place.
Maybe yes, that's kludgy, but the original rationale of it was that
who have `-x11' in PKG_DEFAULT_OPTIONS probably mean "do not pick
any X11 dependency if possible" but when vdpau and vaapi were
introduced to ffmpeg* this was no longer true for them.
- References:
- ffmpeg3 "x11" option vs "vaapi", "vdpau" options
- Re: ffmpeg3 "x11" option vs "vaapi", "vdpau" options
- Re: ffmpeg3 "x11" option vs "vaapi", "vdpau" options
- Re: ffmpeg3 "x11" option vs "vaapi", "vdpau" options
- Re: ffmpeg3 "x11" option vs "vaapi", "vdpau" options
- Re: ffmpeg3 "x11" option vs "vaapi", "vdpau" options
- Re: ffmpeg3 "x11" option vs "vaapi", "vdpau" options
- Re: ffmpeg3 "x11" option vs "vaapi", "vdpau" options
- Re: ffmpeg3 "x11" option vs "vaapi", "vdpau" options
- Re: ffmpeg3 "x11" option vs "vaapi", "vdpau" options
- Re: ffmpeg3 "x11" option vs "vaapi", "vdpau" options
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index